The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog ran from 2006 to 2016 and was intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Mechanical traction for neck pain

    Neck pain is a frequently reported complaint, and mechanical traction is often used to aid outpatient rehabilitation.

    In this Cochrane review by researchers at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, the effects of mechanical traction for neck disorders is assessed.

    First, the details.

    • 7 studies of 958 adults where mechanical traction alone or combined with other treatments was compared to placebo or other treatment were reviewed.
    • Outcomes of interest were pain, function, disability, perceived effect, patient satisfaction, and quality of life.
    • 2 reviewers with different backgrounds in medicine, physiotherapy, massage therapy, and chiropractics independently selected the studies.

    And, the results.

    • The 1 study in 100 patients with a low risk of bias reported no significant difference between continuous traction and placebo traction in reducing pain or improving function for chronic neck disorders with radicular (spinal cord-associated) symptoms.
    • The studies with a low potential for bias neither supported nor refuted the use of continuous or intermittent traction for neck disorders.

    The bottom line?
    The available evidence “does not support or refute the value of continuous or intermittent traction for pain reduction, improved function, or global perceived effect when compared to placebo traction, tablet or heat or other conservative treatments in patients with chronic neck disorders,” concluded the authors.

    SpineUniverse has a concise review of therapeutic spinal traction.

    10/17/08 19:48 JR

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.