The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog ran from 2006 to 2016 and was intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    CAM for children undergoing stem cell transplants

    Researchers in the US and Canada evaluated massage, humor therapy, and relaxation/imagery for reducing distress associated with pediatric stem cell transplantation.

    First, the details.

    • 178 pediatric patients scheduled to undergo stem cell transplantation were randomly assigned to a child-targeted treatment group starting at hospital admission until 3 weeks after stem cell transplantation.
      • Massage + humor therapy
      • The identical child intervention + a parent intervention involving massage and relaxation/imagery
      • Standard care
    • The researchers measured patient and parent reports of somatic distress and mood disturbance from admission through Week 6 after stem cell transplantation using the Behavioral, Affective, and Somatic Experiences Scales (BASES).
      • BASES measures health-related quality of life in pediatric patients undergoing aggressive treatments.
    • Length of hospitalization, time to engraftment (successful implantation and function of stem cells in the patient’s bone marrow), and use of narcotic analgesic and antiemetic medications were also recorded.

    And, the results.

    • No significant differences between treatments were found in health-related quality of life.
    • There were no significant differences between treatments in duration of hospitalization, time to engraftment, and use of narcotic analgesic and antiemetic medications.

    The bottom line?

    The authors concluded, “Results… failed to document significant benefits of complementary interventions in the pediatric stem cell transplantation setting.”

    The researchers hoped their complementary therapy would help “take the edge off” what is a difficult treatment for children to undergo. Unfortunately, in this case it didn’t.

    7/17/10 19:49 JR

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.