Criticism of the latest Ginkgo study
I recently labeled G. biloba the “biggest loser in 2009” based on the results of The Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory (GEM) Study that was published in The Journal of the American Medical Association.”
Now, Mark Blumenthal, founder and executive director of the Austin, Texas-based American Botanical Council, has weighed with his criticism.
He cited the following flaws:
- The data were drawn from an earlier study, which was not designed to determine the decline in cognition.
- The original study, published in 2008, was on prevention of dementia.
- About 40% of the participants dropped out of the study over the 6-year duration of the trial.
- Yet, the study included the dropouts for which no final data were available.
- Certain cognitive parameters were not monitored until several years after the trial began.
- The age of the subjects was advanced — average of 79 years.
- It’s unknown whether a younger group of ginkgo users would have been more responsive.
The bottom line
“This is not the definitive trial on ginkgo,” concluded Mr. Blumenthal.
1/6/10 20:45 JR