The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog ran from 2006 to 2016 and was intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Effects of distant healing on chronic pain

    Some studies on distant healing for chronic pain exist, but the value of this treatment is controversial.

    Researchers from Holos University, in Fair Grove, Missouri contribute a small study to the debate.

    First, the details.

    • 17 people suffering from chronic pain participated.
      • The pain was not caused by clear organic diseases or pain that persisted long after a reasonable period of healing following injuries or surgery.
    • Patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group or control group.
    • All patients met the healer at the initial session where a 20-minute group meditation was performed.
    • The healer went back to Japan after the session and started distant healing only to some of the patients for 2 months.
    • All patients were asked to meditate for 20 minutes every day during this time.

    And, the results.

    • Comparison of pre- and post-treatment visual analog scale indicated no significant effect of distant healing.
    • The Present Pain Intensity Scale from the McGill Pain Questionnaire showed significant improvement in the treatment group compared to the control group.
    • The Pain Rating Index showed improvement in the treatment group, but the difference between both groups was not statistically significant.

    The bottom line?
    It seems that this study does nothing to resolve the controversy

    5/29/09 23:37 JR

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.