The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog ran from 2006 to 2016 and was intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at www.Vicus.com, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Time for the soda tax?

     According to the Wall Street Journal, government officials are considering different public-health efforts to help people curb the weight problem.

    Support for this legislation comes from Drs. Kelly Brownell and Thomas Frieden writing in the New England Journal of Medicine.

    Corollaries to the tobacco wars are unmistakable.

    • Sugar-sweetened beverages (soda sweetened with sugar, corn syrup, or other caloric sweeteners, and sports and energy drinks) may be the single largest driver of the obesity epidemic.
    • Sugared beverages are marketed extensively to children and adolescents.
    • Taxes on tobacco products have been highly effective in reducing consumption.
    • A penny-per-ounce excise tax could reduce consumption of sugared beverages by more than 10%.
    • A penny-per-ounce excise tax would raise an estimated $1.2 billion in New York State alone.
    • Revenue generation can further increase the societal benefits of a tax on soft drinks.

    Those arguing against a soda tax state…

    • A tax would have an disproportionate effect on the poor.
    • It’s unfair to single out one type of food for taxation.
    • The tax will not solve the obesity problem.

    The bottom line?
    Solving the obesity problem is only half the objective. Ever present is the need to make up for government deficits.

    And, it’s an idea being proposed outside the US. For example, France is considering raising taxes on foods that are “trop gras, trop sucrés, trop salés qui ne sont pas de stricte nécessité” — too fatty, too sugary, too salty and not strictly necessary.

    5/12/09 14:13 JR

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.