Comparing chiropractic options for carpal tunnel syndrome
Researchers at the New York Chiropractic College in Seneca Falls compared Graston instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (GISTM) vs soft tissue mobilization (STM) by hand.
First, the details.
- Volunteers with characteristics, and physical and electrodiagnostic findings consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome were randomly allocated to receive either GISTM or STM.
- The abstract does not state the number of volunteers studied.
- Treatment to the affected area was given twice a week for 4 weeks and once a week for 2 additional weeks.
And, the results.
- Patients in both groups had improved nerve conduction latencies, wrist strength, and wrist motion.
- Signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome improved and patients reported satisfaction with the treatment outcomes.
- Improvements were maintained at 3 months for both treatments.
- The hand not treated showed no change, although no initial evidence of carpal tunnel syndrome was presented.
The bottom line?
Either approach to treatment appears to be a good option considering the alternatives.
12/22/07 15:02 JR