The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog ran from 2006 to 2016 and was intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    The value of hypnosis for breast cancer surgery

    Is it possible that brief hypnosis might decrease anesthesia and pain medicine use, as well as side effects associated with breast cancer surgery?

    First, the details: 200 patients scheduled for breast biopsy or lumpectomy were randomly assigned to…

    • a 15-minute presurgery hypnosis session conducted by a psychologist,
    • or nondirective empathic listening (attention control).
    • Obviously, patients were aware of their treatment.

    And, the results.

    • Patients in the hypnosis group required significantly less propofol (Diprivan) and lidocaine (Xylocaine) than patients in the control group.
    • Hypnosis was also associated with less pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, nausea, fatigue, discomfort, and emotional upset.
    • No differences in the use of fentanyl (Duragesic), midazolam (Versed), or the use of pain medicine in the recovery room.
    • Patients in the hypnosis group cost $773 less to care for, mainly due to reduced surgical time.

    The bottom line?
    The application of hypnosis to surgical procedures is not new. An article by Dr. John Kihlstrom from the University of California, Berkeley discusses the history of hypnotism in surgery and the supporting clinical studies.

    Dr. Kihlstrom says hypnosis passes 4 important tests.

    • Effective: Drugs plus hypnosis yield more pain relief than drugs alone.
    • Scientifically supported: Hypnosis is a specific treatment, different from both placebo and from other psychosocial interventions.
    • Cost effective: Reducing the cost of procedures by a nontrivial sum.
    • Improved quality of care.

    8/31/07 20:38 JR

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.