The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog ran from 2006 to 2016 and was intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at www.Vicus.com, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Coenzyme Q10: Two points of view

    It’s always a good idea to get a second opinion when it comes to your healthcare. Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) has been used, recommended, or studied for many conditions, but its use is controversial. Here are two websites that reviewed the literature and are ready to advise on the status of CoQ10 — MotherNature.com (MN) and MayoClinic.com (MC).

    Here are comparative evaluations and ratings for three sample diseases.

    High blood pressure

    • MN: significantly reduced blood pressure (3 stars)
    • MC: caused small decreases in blood pressure (grade B)

    Angina

    • MN: greater ability to exercise without chest pain confirmed in independent investigations (3 stars)
    • MC: Preliminary small human studies suggest it may reduce angina and improve exercise tolerance (grade C)

    Alzheimer’s disease

    • MN: progression of the disease appeared to be prevented for up to two years (1 star)
    • MC: may slow, but not cure, dementia (grade C)

    On MN, 3 stars = reliable, relatively consistent scientific data showing a substantial health benefit, 1 star = little scientific support and/or minimal benefit.

    On MC, Grade B = good scientific evidence, grade C = unclear scientific evidence.

    OK, I’m glad we cleared up that controversy.

    7/32/06 22:30 JR

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.