The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog ran from 2006 to 2016 and was intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Reasons for bias in studies of acupuncture

    Dr. Jiang Tu at Evergreen Medicine, in Pinole, California, reviewed studies from the United States and China and tells us about differences in the design and implementation that might account for discrepancies in results.

    First, the details.

    • Recently published studies in China and the US were retrieved.
    • The author conducted an analysis of randomization methods, research design and implementation, and social conditions.

    And, the results.

    • The use of a blind assessor in acupuncture research is poorly carried out in China compared to the US.
    • There were no significant differences between China and the US in study design and random assignment of patients to treatment.
    • The research design and application of acupuncture is better in China than in the US.

    The bottom line?

    The author concluded that the “blind assessor in acupuncture randomized controlled trials is a key of improving the research quality.”

    Research suggests that it’s possible through the use of non-penetrating placebo needles to conduct a study where the acupuncturist is unaware of the patients receiving real or sham acupuncture.

    A better way might be to use a qualified 3rd party evaluator whose sole role in the study is to evaluate the response treatment. In addition, objective methods of evaluating response should be emphasized over subjective outcomes.

    9/25/10 17:10 JR

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.