The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog ran from 2006 to 2016 and was intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Reviews of acupuncture for primary dysmenorrhea

    Primary dysmenorrhea is painful menstruation that’s not due to a disease, but to menstruation itself.

    There’s “promising evidence” for acupuncture, according to at least 1 group of researchers at Kyung Hee University Medical Center, in Seoul, South Korea.

    First, the details.

    • Only 9 of 27 studies clearly described how they randomly assigned patents to a treatment group.
    • None stated how they prevented the patients and researchers from knowing the treatment administered — blinding.

    And, the results.

    • Compared with pharmacological treatment or herbal medicine, acupuncture was associated with a significant reduction in pain.
    • 3 studies reported reduced pain with acupucnture compared to before the study.
    • 2 studies failed to find a difference between acupuncture and sham acupuncture.

    The bottom line?

    The authors concluded there’s “promising evidence… for the use of acupuncture in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea compared with pharmacological treatment or herbal medicine.”

    They’re apparently willing to overlook the flaws in study design that plague acupuncture studies.

    Also this year, researchers from Australia conducted a similar review and concluded, “At 3 months, although pain outcomes were lower for women in the acupuncture group compared with the control group, there was no significant difference between groups.”

    When patients were followed for  6 and 12 months there was no significant effect with acupuncture, “indicating that [only] a small treatment effect from acupuncture on dysmenorrhea may exist.

    2/27/10 18:00 JR

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.