The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog ran from 2006 to 2016 and was intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at www.Vicus.com, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Is there a role for breathing training in asthma care?

    Up to 30% of patients report having used breathing techniques to control asthma symptoms.

    According to researchers at the University of Southampton, in the UK, it’s worth the effort in selected patients.

    Here’s what we know.

    • Breathing techniques available for use in asthma include:
      • Inspiratory muscle training
      • Pursed-lip breathing
      • Breathing retraining
    • Healthcare professionals are skeptical.
      • In part because of exaggerated and unsubstantiated claims made by proponents of specific breathing training ‘packages’, such as Buteyko practitioners.
    • Does it work?
      • There’s convincing evidence in people with asthma for improved…
        • Symptoms
        • Health status
        • Psychological well-being
        • Possibly reduced rescue bronchodilator medication use.
    • What it doesn’t do
      • No convincing evidence that breathing training improves airway inflammation or physiology.
      • And the mechanisms of benefit are largely unknown.

    The bottom line?

    The authors tell us, “Breathing training requires considerable commitment from the individual patient in terms of time and effort. It suits those who are happy to be involved with self-management but is unlikely to be effective in patients who prefer a ‘quick fix’, or who lack sufficient motivation.”

    Sounds pretty weak.

    Aside from having a strong commitment, at present it ‘s not known which category of patients with asthma are most likely to benefit from breathing training.

    2/15/11 20:35 JR

    Comments are closed.