The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog is intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at www.Vicus.com, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Support this site

    If you found the information here helpful, please consider supporting this site.If you found the information here helpful, please consider supporting this site.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    No regulatory double standard for natural health products

    That’s the editorial position of the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

    Here’s their reasoning.

    Many consumers believe that natural health products are effective and safer than prescription drugs.

    But there is a double standard.

    • Pharmaceutical companies must provide extensive evidence that its product makes a quantifiable difference in a health condition and that the benefits outweigh the risks.
    • The same degree of scrutiny is not applied to natural health products or medicinal foods.
    • The multibillion-dollar natural health products industry sells the perception that because its products are “natural,” they must also be safe.
    • Creating special categories for natural health products or medicinal foods is not the solution.
    • Rather, all health claims for any product should be subject to a common set of regulations, starting with consistent and easily understood standards of evidence proportional to health risks and benefits.

    The bottom line?

    According to the authors, “all health claims for any product should be subject to a common set of regulations, starting with consistent and easily understood standards of evidence proportional to health risks and benefits.”

    Some will argue that only pharmaceutical companies can afford the cost of extensive documentation. But the health of our citizens is at stake. So, why do we permit less of the natural health product manufacturers?

    11/16/11 21:13 JR

    Leave a Comment

    XHTML: Line-breaks are automatic. Available tags are <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>