The C.A.M. Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fair, Balanced, and to the Point
  • About this web log

    This blog is intended as an objective and dispassionate source of information on the latest CAM research. Since my background is in pharmacy and allopathic medicine, I view all CAM as advancing through the development pipeline to eventually become integrated into mainstream medical practice. Some will succeed while others fail. But all are treated fairly here.

  • About the author

    John Russo, Jr., PharmD, is president of The MedCom Resource, Inc. Previously, he was senior vice president of medical communications at www.Vicus.com, a complementary and alternative medicine website.

  • Common sense considerations

    The material on this weblog is for informational purposes. It is not medical advice or counsel. Be smart, consult your health professional before using CAM.

  • Support this site

    If you found the information here helpful, please consider supporting this site.If you found the information here helpful, please consider supporting this site.

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Archive for June, 2006

    Treating herbal products as medicines in Spain

    Thursday, June 29th, 2006

    The latest issue of Functional Foods & Nutraceuticals e-newsletter is out. In it, we learn that Spanish authorities treat herbal products as medicines. They require such products to be withdrawn from the market and to obtain medicinal marketing authorizations.

    In contrast to this, the European Commission considers that the absence of adequate procedures to assess the risk to public health that such products allegedly pose is an unjustified barrier to trade.

    As a result of complaints from companies that want to market herbals in Spain, the European Commission is pursuing infringement procedures against Spain for hampering the free movement of goods in the market.

    6/29/06 21:22 JR

    Who is Wallace Sampson, and why does he dislike NCCAM?

    Thursday, June 22nd, 2006

    Based on his recently published editorial discussed in a previous entry here, it seems appropriate to introduce Wallace Sampson, MD to anyone who has not crossed his path before. Dr. Sampson is an outspoken critic of CAM and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). In 2005, Dr. Sampson wrote it is time for Congress to defund the NCCAM. “After ten years of existence and over $200 million in expenditures, it has not proved effectiveness for any ‘alternative’ method. It has added to proof of ineffectiveness of some methods, but we had that disproof before NCCAM was formed.”

    Please Dr. Sampson, don’t hold back. Tell us what you really think.

    He continues, “They [NCCAM] would supplant objectivity and reason with myths, feelings, hunches, and sophistry.”

    Well, o-kay then.

    Wallace Sampson is a clinical professor emeritus of medicine at Stanford University and editor-in-chief at the Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine. He studies and teaches about unscientific medical systems and aberrant medical claims. He sits on the board of directors of the National Council Against Health Fraud.

    6/22/06 9:32 JR

    National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) criticized for bias

    Wednesday, June 21st, 2006

    In a video taped editorial, Dr. Wallace Sampson complains that the NCCAM on its website, “links to trade and unscientific occupational organizations, and presents anomalous methods in a ‘neutral’ light.” Furthermore, Dr. Wallace states, “It contains minimal cautionary, negative information.” This is all the more disturbing because we expect more from a government-sponsored information resource.

    The NCCAM counters “while some scientific evidence exists regarding some CAM therapies, for most there are key questions that are yet to be answered through well-designed scientific studies, questions such as whether these therapies are safe and whether they work for the diseases or medical conditions for which they are used.”

    As a clinical professor of medicine (emeritus) at Stanford University, and editor of The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine, Dr. Sampson’s assessment must not be dismissed. Is it reasonable to expect that studies of CAM be as well designed as those of conventional medicine? I think so.

    NCCAM provides a useful service in making CAM data available, but studies of ginseng, Ginkgo biloba, garlic supplements, coffee enemas, and glucosamine, for example, should be held to high study design standards.

    6/21/06 22:14 JR

    Debating the credibility of CAM and its critics

    Tuesday, June 20th, 2006

    Dr. Stephen Barrett (photo) is critical of the 2005 report by the Board of Health Promotion and Disease Preventions (HPDP). The stated goal of the report is to describe the use of CAM therapies by the American public and provide a comprehensive overview of this therapy.

    A few of his main criticisms are listed below. (more…)

    Looking or a qualified CAM practitioner?

    Tuesday, June 20th, 2006

    Try the The National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine (NCCAOM) online directory, which lists practitioners who meet national requirements for board certification in one or more practice areas such as oriental medicine, acupuncture, Chinese herbology, or Asian bodywork therapy. These practitioners have met all requirements for NCCAOM certification in the specific program area.

    It’s a start.

    6/20/06 21:00 JR